<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzzword 2.0</title>
	<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/</link>
	<description>A blog about electronic marketing, culture, and life on the digital frontier.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Web 4.0...  How about going the Microsoft / Adobe route and chucking version numbers altogether.  We could have Web Xtreme!  ...  All my buzzwords are still in beta :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 4.0&#8230;  How about going the Microsoft / Adobe route and chucking version numbers altogether.  We could have Web Xtreme!  &#8230;  All my buzzwords are still in beta :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: higher ed marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Five: higher ed&#8217;s future, web buzzwords, the blogging boom, and garage rock</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>higher ed marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Five: higher ed&#8217;s future, web buzzwords, the blogging boom, and garage rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Web what-dot-evah. Morgan Davis&#8217; erelevant blog is brand now, but he&#8217;s off to a great start. His recent post, Buzzword 2.0, takes a lot of us to task for tossing &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; around in conversations and on our blogs (guilty). His advice: &#8220;let’s work on using alternative words and phrases to describe the concepts that we mean by web 2.0.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Web what-dot-evah. Morgan Davis&#8217; erelevant blog is brand now, but he&#8217;s off to a great start. His recent post, Buzzword 2.0, takes a lot of us to task for tossing &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; around in conversations and on our blogs (guilty). His advice: &#8220;let’s work on using alternative words and phrases to describe the concepts that we mean by web 2.0.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I am tired of nebulous terms being used. Web 2.0 (in whatever usage) is hardly anything revolutionary as it is being made out to be.  At best most of the technologies that people refer to when talking about Web 2.0 are evolutionary. Let's not call it 2.0 until revolutionary changes are made to the WWW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I am tired of nebulous terms being used. Web 2.0 (in whatever usage) is hardly anything revolutionary as it is being made out to be.  At best most of the technologies that people refer to when talking about Web 2.0 are evolutionary. Let&#8217;s not call it 2.0 until revolutionary changes are made to the <a href="http://WWW." rel="nofollow">http://WWW.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Careaga</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Careaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/09/buzzword-20/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Congrats on entering the blogosphere. I agree that web 2.0 is overused and overhyped. I'm afraid the same thing is about to happen with &lt;a href="http://lokesh.cjb.cc/2006/08/02/what-is-web-30/" rel="nofollow"&gt;web 3.0&lt;/a&gt;, so I'm thinking about skipping right over that buzzword and on to web 4.0. Whaddya think? ;)

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on entering the blogosphere. I agree that web 2.0 is overused and overhyped. I&#8217;m afraid the same thing is about to happen with <a href="http://lokesh.cjb.cc/2006/08/02/what-is-web-30/" rel="nofollow">web 3.0</a>, so I&#8217;m thinking about skipping right over that buzzword and on to web 4.0. Whaddya think? ;)</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
