<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In a Redesign Mood Part II</title>
	<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/in-a-redesign-mood-part-ii/</link>
	<description>A blog about electronic marketing, culture, and life on the digital frontier.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/in-a-redesign-mood-part-ii/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/in-a-redesign-mood-part-ii/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>What do you do to update it? Is it a homebrewed database-driven situation? Is it all done by hand, pushed server-side with that php? I'm stuck in this "dynamic, dynamic!!" mindset since that's a necessary component of the web design that I'm doing this summer for my internship. Joomla is fun. I don't mean to pry into state secrets, just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you do to update it? Is it a homebrewed database-driven situation? Is it all done by hand, pushed server-side with that php? I&#8217;m stuck in this &#8220;dynamic, dynamic!!&#8221; mindset since that&#8217;s a necessary component of the web design that I&#8217;m doing this summer for my internship. Joomla is fun. I don&#8217;t mean to pry into state secrets, just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/in-a-redesign-mood-part-ii/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/in-a-redesign-mood-part-ii/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>And no I certainly don't think this verges on the "edge of artsy."  It's fairly plain.  The icons need work bad, and the bevelling could be more consistant.  The typography has interest but could certainly use work.  There are some serious usability issues going on with links and link color.  On the whole, I think it looks like a rougher Northland but with WWC's strong photography.

Most of all, I'm not convinced that this style of design (the smooth, gradient-laden, beveled look) accurately represents the Warren Wilson brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And no I certainly don&#8217;t think this verges on the &#8220;edge of artsy.&#8221;  It&#8217;s fairly plain.  The icons need work bad, and the bevelling could be more consistant.  The typography has interest but could certainly use work.  There are some serious usability issues going on with links and link color.  On the whole, I think it looks like a rougher Northland but with WWC&#8217;s strong photography.</p>
<p>Most of all, I&#8217;m not convinced that this style of design (the smooth, gradient-laden, beveled look) accurately represents the Warren Wilson brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
