<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As Seen On TV!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/podcast/</link>
	<description>A blog about electronic marketing, culture, and life on the digital frontier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erelevant.net/?p=11#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and correction Dan.  You&#039;ve given a perfect example of returning to your market to keep your marketing efforts relevant.  I sometimes wish that I worked at a big enough institution to make something like a content-specific podcast really worthwhile!  One of the problems being at such a small place is that our marketing efforts generally have to appeal to a wide swath of prospects with very different interests and personalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and correction Dan.  You&#8217;ve given a perfect example of returning to your market to keep your marketing efforts relevant.  I sometimes wish that I worked at a big enough institution to make something like a content-specific podcast really worthwhile!  One of the problems being at such a small place is that our marketing efforts generally have to appeal to a wide swath of prospects with very different interests and personalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Karleen</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/08/11/podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Karleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erelevant.net/?p=11#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Morgan, 
Thanks for the mention. Matthew didn&#039;t actually say that his podcasts are intended to have a recruiting-specific focus.  Newer media like blogs and podcasts are shaking up university communications in general.  However, since you mention recruiting, let&#039;s say I&#039;m a sports nut choosing among several institutions, and one of them happens to offer a video or audio interview with the coaches, players, or staff.  All other things being equal (and assuming careful selection of on-air talent), which institution do you think is at an advantage?  Taken this way, it&#039;s an opportunity game, not a numbers game, in my opinion. Your thoughts?
Dan
P.S. Love your new blog. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Morgan,<br />
Thanks for the mention. Matthew didn&#8217;t actually say that his podcasts are intended to have a recruiting-specific focus.  Newer media like blogs and podcasts are shaking up university communications in general.  However, since you mention recruiting, let&#8217;s say I&#8217;m a sports nut choosing among several institutions, and one of them happens to offer a video or audio interview with the coaches, players, or staff.  All other things being equal (and assuming careful selection of on-air talent), which institution do you think is at an advantage?  Taken this way, it&#8217;s an opportunity game, not a numbers game, in my opinion. Your thoughts?<br />
Dan<br />
P.S. Love your new blog. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

