<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Margaret Spellings&#8217; Plan is Fraught with Contradictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erelevant.net/2006/09/27/margaret-spellings-disingenuous-administration-mouthpiece-or-ignorant-bureaucrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/09/27/margaret-spellings-disingenuous-administration-mouthpiece-or-ignorant-bureaucrat/</link>
	<description>A blog about electronic marketing, culture, and life on the digital frontier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/09/27/margaret-spellings-disingenuous-administration-mouthpiece-or-ignorant-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erelevant.net/?p=42#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Oh, and to keep it old school one more time: someone should go reread what The Carnegie Commission / Council on higher education did back from &#039;70 onwards... It had some good points and suggestions for reform that I think could have been adopted more fully than they were. Still stuff to learn from &#039;68-9, as my Columbia riots paper taught me.

What&#039;s more, Students for a Democratic Society was reborn last January. We have a chapter here on campus now. They say they&#039;re nonviolent now, but, hey... another throwback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and to keep it old school one more time: someone should go reread what The Carnegie Commission / Council on higher education did back from &#8216;70 onwards&#8230; It had some good points and suggestions for reform that I think could have been adopted more fully than they were. Still stuff to learn from &#8216;68-9, as my Columbia riots paper taught me.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, Students for a Democratic Society was reborn last January. We have a chapter here on campus now. They say they&#8217;re nonviolent now, but, hey&#8230; another throwback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.erelevant.net/2006/09/27/margaret-spellings-disingenuous-administration-mouthpiece-or-ignorant-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erelevant.net/?p=42#comment-97</guid>
		<description>The speech was so ridiculous. It was one of those times--which have been coming perhaps more frequently in these last 6 years than in the previous 8?--where I just throw up my hands and curse the world. Not that I could really compare; my clearest memories of the Clinton years were of things like the time in 4th gradel I made many, many terrible jokes about Monica Lewinsky while reading &#039;Election&#039; ...with my mom.

Everything you&#039;ve hit upon here is spot on. When I look at what the woman said I can only hope and pray it&#039;s a matter of her being &#039;out of touch&#039; rather than... serious. Whether I&#039;d rather have an out of touch secretary of education over a psychotic one is a question worthy of some debate, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speech was so ridiculous. It was one of those times&#8211;which have been coming perhaps more frequently in these last 6 years than in the previous 8?&#8211;where I just throw up my hands and curse the world. Not that I could really compare; my clearest memories of the Clinton years were of things like the time in 4th gradel I made many, many terrible jokes about Monica Lewinsky while reading &#8216;Election&#8217; &#8230;with my mom.</p>
<p>Everything you&#8217;ve hit upon here is spot on. When I look at what the woman said I can only hope and pray it&#8217;s a matter of her being &#8216;out of touch&#8217; rather than&#8230; serious. Whether I&#8217;d rather have an out of touch secretary of education over a psychotic one is a question worthy of some debate, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
